Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lázaro Venturine DeOliveira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lázaro Venturine DeOliveira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and who isn't the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Article was previously tagged for PROD in 2011, but the article's creator removed the tag without explanation. Jogurney (talk) 17:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence this guy meets subject specific guidelines (WP:NFOOTBALL) and no in depth coverage by independant sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Of the links provided in the article, several are dead links or to non existant domains, the others are to his club website and there is no in depth articles even there. ClubOranje^T 10:33, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.